Statement and Arguments Posted by vuotaa.com Categories Blog Date 7 April 2024 Comments 0 comment Report a question What’s wrong with this question? You cannot submit an empty report. Please add some details. /50 Statement and Arguments Statement and arguments tasks in analytical reasoning involve evaluating the validity of arguments based on given statements. Participants must assess the logical consistency and coherence between the statements and the arguments presented. They analyze the provided statements to identify underlying premises or assumptions, and then evaluate whether the arguments logically follow from them. Mastery of statement and arguments enhances critical thinking, reasoning skills, and the ability to assess the strength of arguments based on evidence. These exercises are common in aptitude tests, debates, and decision-making scenarios, serving as a measure of one’s ability to evaluate and construct persuasive arguments effectively. 1 / 50 1) Statement Should the examination bodies for all university examinations permit the use of calculators? Arguments I. No, it is necessary for the students to know the methods of manual calculation to make their concepts clear. II. Yes, manual calculations are no more required with extensive use of computers in all fields. A) If only Argument I is strong B) If either I or II is strong. C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If neither I nor II is strong. Methods of manual calculations are necessary for individuals. Hence, they should be encouraged. Thus, Argument I is strong. Argument II is also strong in its way but since I and II contradict each other, we go for the choice (c). 2 / 50 2) Statement Should the knowledge of Hindi languages be made compulsory for all the employees of public sector organisations? Arguments I. Yes, it is necessary for dealing with people from the educationally backward strata of the society. II. No, It is not necessary for every employee to have the knowledge of Hindi language. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I is strong because in public sector organizations, there are some people who are not well educated. Hence, with Hindi language, it will be possible to deal with them. Hence, only Argument I is strong 3 / 50 3) Statement Should the major part of school examinations be made objective type? Arguments T I. No, objective type examination does not test the students ability to express. II. Yes, this is the best method of assessing one’s ability and knowledge. A) If only Argument I is strong B) If either I or II is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong as the ability to express gives groundness to one’s education. Argument II is weak because to call a method ‘the best’ without giving any reason is a simplistic assertion. 4 / 50 4) Statement Should speed breakers on roads be outlawed? Arguments I. No, speed breakers are a simple way to reduce vehicle speed. II. Yes, some people fail to see the speed breakers at night. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If both I and II are strong C) If only Argument I is strong. D) If neither I nor II is strong. Argument I is strong as speed breakers reduces speed. Argument II is weak as people fails to see speed breakers because of the absence of proper lighting. Road lighting should be improved instead of eliminating speed breakers. 5 / 50 5) Statement Should we impart sex education in schools? Arguments I. Yes, all the progressive nations do so. II. No, we cannot impart it in a co-educational school. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. The culture of India is very much different from that of the western countries. So whatever is liked there may not be necessarily regarded good here. Moreover, children need not such type of education but they are adults who should be imparted sex education. Knowledge of sex in real sense is not an innate process. So, both the arguments are ambiguous and not supported by a clear cut logic. Hence, both are weak. 6 / 50 6) Statement Should the government sell major part of its stake in all the profit making public sector undertakings? Arguments I. No, government should not give up its control of these undertaking as these are profit making organisations. II. Yes, this will help government reduce the quantum of huge budgetary deficit and argument its resources. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument II is strong because the organisations are profit making, so government can reduce budgetary deficit by selling its stake in the organisation. 7 / 50 7) Statement Should there be only a uniform rate of income tax irrespective of the level of income? Arguments T I. Yes, this will substantially reduce the work of the officials of the income tax department. II. No, this will reduce government tax collection to a large extent. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I is weak because reduction of work load of IT officials is not too desirable a motive. Argument II is strong as reduced tax collection will have a bad impact on state activities. 8 / 50 8) Statement Should school education be made free in India? Arguments I. Yes, this is the only way to improve the level of literacy. II. No, it will add to the already heavy burden on the exchequer. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If both I and II are strong Argument I is not strong because word ‘only’ makes the argument weak as it is not the only real and practical solution to improve the level of literacy. Argument II is strong as it describes the practical problem which may arise out of the decision of making education free in India. 9 / 50 9) Statement Should medical entrance test be made compulsory? Arguments I. Yes, we have to ensure high quality of medical education to meet the demands of rapidly advancing medical field. II. No, this will keep medical education out of the reach of large number of rural and urban deprived children. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If both I and II are strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong because to ensure quality of medical education with advancing medical field, we need more and more competent and knowledgable people. Hence for this medical test should be made compulsary. Argument I is weak as making medical entrance test compulsary doesn’t deprive rural and urban children out of education. Infact it promotes students to work hard and gain more and more knowledge 10 / 50 10) Statement Should only reputed NGO’s be authorised to distribute the commodities to the public under the programme of Public Distribution System (PDS)? Arguments I. Yes, the move will be helpful to implement the programme more effectively and will keep a tab on various problems like black marketing of the commodities supplied under PDS. II. Yes, NGO’s have helped government on many occasions. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong because it will reduce the problem of black marketing of commodities supplied under PDS. Argument II is not strong because it is not directly related with the statement. 11 / 50 11) Statement Should advertisements be banned on television? Arguments I. Yes, advertisement are immoral. II. No, advertisement bring in revenue which helps reduce cost for viewers. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If both I and II are strong Argument I is weak because not every advertisement is immoral. Argument II is strong as advertisement bring in revenue which helps reduce cost for viewers. 12 / 50 12) Statement Should the minimum age of marriage for boys be brought down to 18 yr? Arguments I. No, an 18 yr old boy is not capable of taking responsibility to start a family. II. Yes, since the minimum age for marriage for girls is 18 yr, the same should be applicable for boys as well. III. No, the boys should be allowed to marry only after they become self-dependent. A) Only III is strong B) Only II is strong C) Only either I or II is strong D) Only I is strong Only Argument I holds strong to support the statement. Argument II shows the comparison between girls and boys, so it is weak and also Argument III is vague. 13 / 50 13) Statement Should graduation be made minimum educational qualification for entry level jobs in any public sector organisation? Arguments I. Yes, graduates always perform better than non-graduates by virtue of their higher level of education. II. No, there are quite a few people who cannot afford to remain unemployed till the completion of graduation and are capable of performing equally well as the graduate candidates A) If only Argument I is strong B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If either I or II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is not necessarily true. Hence, it is weak. Argument II deviates from the core issue. Hence, it is also weak. 14 / 50 14) Statement Should educational institutes allow their students to join student unions that are sponsored by political parties? Arguments I. No, the decision will politicise the educational environment of their institute. II. Yes, the decision will help students nurture their talent and develop into future political leaders. A) If both I and II are strong B) If only Argument I is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Both the arguments are strong, as educational institutes think about educational environment. But at the same time talent of students should also be nurtured. 15 / 50 15) Statement Should there be a complete ban on celebration of various ‘days’ in colleges’? Arguments I. No, there is nothing wrong in celebrating the days and enjoying once in a while. II. Yes, children are giving more importance to such celebrations than the studies. III. No, this type of celebration gives opportunity for children to express their feelings. A) Only II is strong B) Only III is strong C) I and II are strong D) II and III are strong Argument I is vague because it lacks a proper reason. Arguments II and III are strong as they provide a proper answer to the question. Argument II explains the correct reason for putting a ban on such days. Also, during these days the children can express their feelings, so III is also correct. 16 / 50 16) Statement Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India? Arguments I. Yes, this is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases. II. No, each individual should have right to choose what he wants. III. No, there is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body. IV. Yes, it is banned in many other countries also. A) Only I is strong B) I and IV are strong C) Only III is strong D) I and II are strong Argument I is not strong due to the word ‘only’. Argument II is not strong because it is baseless and Argument III is strong because there is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body. What other countries are doing, we should not follow that blindly. So, Argument IV is not strong 17 / 50 17) Statement Should the sale of tobacco products be restricted to only a few outlets in each city/town? Arguments I. Yes, this will substantially reduce consumption of tobacco products. II. No, those who want to purchase tobacco products should get them at convenient locations. A) If either I or II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong as reduced tobacco consumption is desirable. Argument II is weak as such convenience is not desirable. 18 / 50 18) Statement Should it be made compulsory for all the private sector organisations to reserve quota for socially backward classes? Arguments I. No, the private sector should not be governed by the Government rules. II. Yes, private sector organisations should also contribute in upliftment of socially backward classes. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If either I or II is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument I is strong For all the private sector organisations to reserve quota for socially backward classes is not necessary. All the people should get the chance for job. Hence, only Argument I is strong. 19 / 50 19) Statement Are 21st century teenagers under stress? Arguments I. Yes, teenagers perception is that they are expected to be successful or good at everything. Failure has somehow gone from being viewed as a learning opportunity to being clearly unacceptable. II. No, stress is a relative perception that can be managed with proper guidance. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If both I and II are strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument I is strong. Both the arguments are strong, teenager of 21st century are expected to be successful and they do not accept failures which in turn gives birth to stress. But stress is also a relative perception and can be managed with proper guidance. 20 / 50 20) Statement Should young entrepreneurs be encouraged? Arguments I. Yes, they will help in the industrial development of the country. II. Yes, they will reduce the burden on the employment market. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If both I and II are strong It is very clear that encouragement to the young entrepreneurs will open up the fields for setting up of new industries. Therefore, it will help in industrial development. Consequently, more job opportunities will be created. Thus, both the arguments are strong. 21 / 50 21) Statement Should the private compaines be allowed to operate passenger train services in India? Arguments I. Yes, this will improve the quality of service in Indian Railways as it will have to face severe competition. II. No, the private companies may not agree to operate in the non-profitable sectors. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If both I and II are strong C) If only Argument I is strong. D) If neither I nor II is strong. Argument I is strong because competition increases the quality of service. From the statement, it is not clear that railways is a non-profitable sector and private companies are also operating in non-profitable sectors. So, Argument II is not strong. 22 / 50 22) Statement Should parents in India. In future be forced to opt for only one child as against two or many at present? Arguments I. Yes, this is the only way to check the ever increasing population of India. II. No, this type of pressure tactic is not adopted by any other country in the world. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I is weak because it is superfluous. It does not go into the reason for population control. Argument II is an argument by example and hence, it is weak. 23 / 50 23) Statement Should there be a complete ban on mining coal in India? Arguments I. Yes, the present stock coal will not last long, if we continue mining at the present rate. II. No, we do not have alternate energy source of sufficient quantity. A) If either I or II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is a weak argument as it is not relevant to ‘complete ban.’ Argument II is strong as banning in such a scenario will lead us into great trouble. 24 / 50 24) Statement Should children be prevented completely from watching the television? Arguments I. No, we get vital information regarding education through television. II. Yes, it hampers the study of children A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If neither I nor II is strong. No, children should not be prevented completely from watching the television because we get vital information regarding education through television and it does not hamper the study of children, if it is watched in limits. So, Argument I is strong, while Argument II is weak 25 / 50 25) Statement Should all the slums in big cities be demolished and the people living in such slums be relocated outside the city limits? Arguments I. No, all these people will lose their home and livelihood and hence, they should not be relocated. II. Yes, the big cities need more and more spaces to carry out development activites and hence, these slums should be removed A) If both I and II are strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If either I or II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong on humanitarian grounds. Argument II is strong on economic grounds 26 / 50 26) Statement Should there be uniforms for students in the colleges in India like they are in the schools? Arguments I. Yes, this will improve the ambience of the colleges as all the students will be decently dressed. II. No, college students should not be regimented and they should be free to choose their clothes while coming to college. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If either I or II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong. D) If only Argument I is strong Argument I is strong as improved ambience is desirable. Argument II is strong because segmentation of adults is undesirable. 27 / 50 27) Statement Should the organisations like the UNO be abolished? Arguments I. Yes, the cold war is going to an end, so there is no role of such organisations. II. No, in the absence of these organisations, there will be a World War. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If either I or II is strong. D) If neither I nor II is strong. An organisation like UNO is meant to maintain peace all over and will always serve to prevent conflicts between countries. So, its role never ends. Hence, Argument I does not hold. Also, lack of such an organisation may in future lead to increased mutual conflicts and international wars, on account of lack of a common platform for mutual discussions. So, Argument II holds. 28 / 50 28) Statement Should India make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfil its energy requirement? Arguments I. Yes, most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible. II. No, harnessing solar energy requires a lot of capital, which India lacks in. A) If either I or II is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong i.e., India should make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfill its energy requirement because most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible. Argument II is weak. 29 / 50 29) Statement Should the sex determination test during pregnancy be completely banned? Arguments I. Yes, this leads to indiscriminate female foeticide and eventually will lead to social imbalance. II. No, people have a right to know about their unborn child. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I is strong as female foeticide is undesirable. Argument II is weak. Which right are we talking about? Right to know the gender of the unborn child ? No. Parents can wait till the child’s birth. 30 / 50 30) Statement Should the women be advised not to travel alone at night in view of the increasing incidences of rape and sexual abuse? Arguments I. No, instead the government should take measures to control such incidences. II. Yes, it is difficult even for the police department to control such cases. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I does not establish proper relation with the statement. Argument II may be an opinion and has not been discussed in the given statement. Hence, I and II both are weak. 31 / 50 31) Statement Luxury hotels should be banned in India. Arguments I. Yes, these places are turning into operating centers for international criminals. II. No. well off foreign tourists won’t be able to find a suitable place to stay. A) If both I and II are strong B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If only Argument I is strong. The luxury hotels are symbols of country’s development and a place for staying the affluent foreign tourists. So, Argument II is a strong one. Argument I is a weak argument because there is no strong evidence that international crime operates from luxury hotels. Moreover banning will not eliminate the crime instead making stringent laws and impleting them will be desirable step. 32 / 50 32) Statement Should all the electricity state boards be privatised in India? Arguments I. No, this will increase the grievances of the people. II. Yes, it will check the growing menace of power theft which has resulted in annual pilferage of a huge amount. A) If both I and II are strong B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument I is strong. Argument I is not strong because it does not tell that why the grievances of people will increase. Argument II is strong because it will reduce the power theft which has resulted in annual pilfenge of a huge amount. 33 / 50 33) Statement Are the fabulous prices demanded by the art dealers for the original paintings of old masters justified? Arguments I. Yes, those are unattainable antique pieces of art, hence, worth their price for the collectors of art. II. No, modern painters can paint as well, if not better than them and for much less price. A) If either I or II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong. Fabulous prices for old master piece are demanded because of their originality and innovative hard efforts. 34 / 50 34) Statement Should there be complete ban on manufacture of fire crackers in India? Arguments I. No, this will render thousands of workers jobless. II. Yes, the fire cracker manufacturers use child labour to a large extent. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong. D) If both I and II are strong Both the arguments refer to the practical consequences of the action mentioned in the statement and hence, are strong. 35 / 50 35) Statement Should a child from a not-so-affluent family in India be allowed to follow his / her passion? Arguments I. Yes, these days if a child is allowed to pursue her / his interests, she / he can excel in it, even financially. II. No, even today our country does not have a strong social security system and establishing oneself in unconventional fields is time consuming and can be financially taxing A) If either I or II is strong B) If only Argument I is strong C) If both I and II are strong D) f only Argument II is strong Argument I is strong as now a days there are ocean of opportunities available in diverse fields. If a child has a passion, then he/she can excel in any field of his/her interest and can become financially independent also. Argument II is weak as lack of social security system, should not hinder the growth of a child. This type of idea is deterimental to the expansion of talent and will only on society a regressive one. 36 / 50 36) Statement Should one year of army training be compulsory for all Indian citizens? Arguments I. No, the costs of training will be prohibitive and one year of labour will be lost. II. Yes, army training helps make better citizens A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong. D) If both I and II are strong As per the statement, if one year of army training be compulsory for all Indian citizens, then it is not so beneficial because the cost of training will be prohibitive and one year of labour will be lost. It is not necessary to join army to be a better citizen. 37 / 50 37) Statement Should a cricket team have more than one captain during a match? Arguments I. No, one needs to make decisions on the spot and there won’t be time to resolve conflicting ideas between the captains on the field if such a scenario emerges. II. Yes, it is always better to have more brains coming to an understanding before taking a decision. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If only Argument I is strong. Argument I is strong because if there will be only one captain, then the descision will be quick otherwise conflicting ideas will only lead to ambiguous situations. Argument II is weak, as having one captain doesn’t forbid him to consult other members of his team. He can take advice and suggestions from his team members. 38 / 50 38) Statement Should computer knowledge be made compulsory for all school students? ArgumentsI. Yes, India is aiming at digitialising its villages andstarting computer education at school level willfacilitate this.II. Yes, this will help the youth to be better equipped toseek jobs as computer knowledge is considered as anessential skill. A) If either I or II is strong B) f only Argument II is strong C) If both I and II are strong D) If only Argument I is strong Argument I is strong as for digitalisation, computer education is necessary and providing computer education at school level will facilitates this. Argument II is also strong because computer knowledge have become prerequisite in almost every kind of job. So, computer knowledge will be an added skill for job seekers. Hence, both arguments are strong. 39 / 50 39) Statement Should parents invest as much in educating their daughters as much as they spend on educating their sons? Arguments I. No, almost all data points to the fact that boys are way more intelligent than girls. II. No, though girls may be intelligent, parents have to keep money aside for their marriages. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If neither I nor II is strong. Argument I is weak, as it is totally gender biased and absurd. Argument II is also weak, as it is a socially regressive mindset. Educating girls will make them more strongerboth socially and financially.∴Both the arguments are weak. 40 / 50 40) Statement Should the government levy tax on agricultural income also? Arguments I. Yes, that is the only way to fill Government’s coffer. II. No, 80% of our population live in rural areas. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong D) If either I or II is strong. Arguments I and II both are weak, the argument that government’s coffer can be filled only with the tax on agriculture is totally irrelevant. Secondly, it cannot be said that all the 80% rural population are poor. 41 / 50 41) Statement Should government service in rural areas be made compulsary atleast for two years after completion of graduation for the students of medicine? Arguments I. Yes, it is everyone’s duty to serve the people in rural areas and contribute to their upliftment. II. No, it cannot be applied only to the medicine students, since anyways they are contributing during their studies and particularly in the period of internship. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If either I or II is strong. C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If only Argument I is strong Argument I is weak because it is not true. You cannot sweep ‘everyone’ with the same brush. Argument II is ambiguous. It first says, ‘it cannot be applied only to the medicine students’. But remaining part of theargument has got nothing to do withthis only. 42 / 50 42) Statement Should the sale of all the toys made in China be banned in India? Arguments I. Yes, these are very cheap and hence, will put the local toy manufacturers out of business. II. No, Indian toys are of much better quality and their sale will not be affected. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If neither I nor II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Both are strong but both cannot be true at the same time. The sale will either be affected (as I says) or not be affected (as II says). Hence, either is strong. 43 / 50 43) Statement Should there be no examination upto Std IX in all the schools in India? Arguments I. No, students need to go through the process of giving examinations right from young age. II. Yes, this will help students to think laterally and achieve their creative pursuits. A) If only Argument II is strong. B) If either I or II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong. D) If only Argument I is strong Argument I is strong as school is the ground where we prepare the students for the future battles of life. Argument II is strong as examinations kill our creativity, turning us all into mere clerks. 44 / 50 44) Statement Should all the factories in the cities be shifted to the outskirts, far away from the main city? Arguments I. Yes, this is an essential Step for controlling pollution in the city. II. No, such a Step will lead to lot of inconvenience to the employees of the factories and their families as well. A) If only Argument I is strong B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If only Argument II is strong. D) If either I or II is strong. Argument I is strong because pollution control is highly desirable. Argument II is weak. 45 / 50 45) Statement Should all the government owned educational institutions be given to private sector? Arguments I. Yes, there will be upgradation of educational standard in these institutions. II. No, the educational standard of these institutions will decrease. A) If only Argument I is strong B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If either I or II is strong. D) If neither I nor II is strong. Private sector is supposed to be more disciplined and efficient than the government sector. Hence, I is strong. II is rubbish. 46 / 50 46) Statement Should there be a ban on product advertisements ? Arguments I. No, it is an age of advertising. unless your advertisement is better than that of your other competitors, the products will not be sold. II. Yes, the money spent on advertising is very huge and it inflates the cost of the products. A) If either I or II is strong. B) If only Argument II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong D) If both I and II are strong. It is a known fact that unless you create awareness through advertisements, about your product, you lag behind from your competitors. Also, heavy cost on advertisements adds to your product. Hence, both thearguments are strong. 47 / 50 47) Statement Should the public sector undertakings be allowed to adopt hire-and-fire policy? Arguments I. Yes, as this will help the public sector undertaking to get rid of non-performing employees and will also help to reward the performing employees. II. No, the management may not be able to implement the policy in an unbiased manner and the employees will suffer due to the high-handedness of the management. A) If neither I nor II is strong. B) If either I or II is strong. C) If only Argument I is strong D) If only Argument II is strong. Argument I is strong as hire and fire policy will help public sector enterprise to get rid of non performing employes. Argument II is ambiguous. Hence weak. 48 / 50 48) Statement Should small states be formed out of bigger states in India? Arguments I. Yes, there will be greater administrative convenience. II. No, it will jeopardise the national integration. A) If both I and II are strong. B) If only Argument I is strong C) If either I or II is strong. D) If only Argument II is strong. Arguments I and II both are strong as there will be greater administrative convenience by forming small states out of bigger states in India. Secondly, it may also lead to a danger to the national integration. 49 / 50 49) Statement Should the provision to dissolve the assembly prematurely be amended? Arguments I. Yes, on many occasions the provision has been used by ruling governments to fulfil vested interests. II. No, to fulfil the constitutional obligations and norms, it sometimes becomes the need of the hour to dissolve the assemly prematurely A) If both I and II are strong B) If only Argument I is strong C) If either I or II is strong D) f only Argument II is strong Either Argument I or II is strong because many times ruling government misuse it while sometimes dissolving the assembly becomes the need of the hour. 50 / 50 50) Statement Should the government shut down all government organisations to arrest the misuse of funds? Arguments I. Yes, public funds will be saved by shutting down government organisations. II. No, services from the government organisations cannot be handed over to the private institutions. A) If only Argument I is strong. B) If neither I nor II is strong. C) If both I and II are strong D) If only Argument II is strong. Only Argument II is strong as services from the government organisation cannot be handed over to private institutions. Your score is LinkedIn Facebook Twitter 0% Exit Share: vuotaa.com Previous post Statement and Conclusions 7 April 2024 Next post Statement and Assumptions 7 April 2024 You may also like Sentence Completion 7 April, 2024 Passage and Conclusions 7 April, 2024 Cause and Effects 7 April, 2024
